essay2
Jun 24th 2010 16:42
TOEFL
Q. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Companies should hire workers for their entire lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.
While some people believe that companies don't need hire employers for their whole lives, I agree that conpanies should hire woker for their entire lives. There are two reasons for this; one reason is that workers can work without stress, the other reason is that this is benefit not only for employers but also companies.
First of all, if so, workers can work without anxiety. To begin with, they can easily make their plans for their lives. For example, if they were afraid of getting fired they are not able to lend money from banks for the loan of their house, and to get married. In addition, when workers work feeling anxiety of getting fired, they cannot relax. For example my uncle is always afraid of getting fired, as a result, they got sick. Consequently if companies don't hire workers for entire their lives, the employers will be unhappy and be not able to
work with releaf.
Secondly, this policy will be good effect not only for employers but also companies. First if companies do so, the workers can get skills. For example, I
heard that the workers who have worked for Canon for 20 years have the excellent skill to create high quality camera and this is obviously benefit for Canon. Moreover the atomosphere will be good because the wokers have been
working together for a long time. For these reasons, this policy can have positive effect for the companies.
In conclusion, for these two reasons: worker's relief and benefit for company, I believe that companies should hire wokers for their entire lives.
While some people believe that companies don't need hire employers for their whole lives, I agree that conpanies should hire woker for their entire lives. There are two reasons for this; one reason is that workers can work without stress, the other reason is that this is benefit not only for employers but also companies.
First of all, if so, workers can work without anxiety. To begin with, they can easily make their plans for their lives. For example, if they were afraid of getting fired they are not able to lend money from banks for the loan of their house, and to get married. In addition, when workers work feeling anxiety of getting fired, they cannot relax. For example my uncle is always afraid of getting fired, as a result, they got sick. Consequently if companies don't hire workers for entire their lives, the employers will be unhappy and be not able to
work with releaf.
Secondly, this policy will be good effect not only for employers but also companies. First if companies do so, the workers can get skills. For example, I
heard that the workers who have worked for Canon for 20 years have the excellent skill to create high quality camera and this is obviously benefit for Canon. Moreover the atomosphere will be good because the wokers have been
working together for a long time. For these reasons, this policy can have positive effect for the companies.
In conclusion, for these two reasons: worker's relief and benefit for company, I believe that companies should hire wokers for their entire lives.
- 7
- 0
- 1
Journals Statistics
Latest entry
| essay2 (1) |
| essay (3) |
| PLEASE HELP!!! (cont.) (2) |
| PLEASE HELP!!! (1) |
| I will go to Boston, New York and Washington D.C ! (4) |
Latest comments
| Jun 29th Ryo |
| Jun 27th violetize |
| Jun 27th violetize |
| Jun 26th violetize |
| Jun 24th Ryo |
Entries by Month
| 2010 |
|---|
| - June (4) |
| - February (1) |
| - January (3) |
While some people believe that companies don't need to hire employees for their whole lives, I agree that companies should hire workers for their entire lives.
There are two reasons for this; one reason is that workers can work without stress, the other reason is that this is a benefit not only for employees but also employers.
To begin with, they can easily make their plans for their lives.
For example, if they were afraid of getting fired, they are not able to borrow money from banks for housing loans, and to get married.
In addition, when workers work feeling anxiety from the possibility of getting fired, they cannot relax.
For example my uncle is always afraid of getting fired. As a result, he got sick.
Consequently, if companies don't hire workers for their entire lives, the employees will be unhappy and be not able to
work calmly.
Secondly, this policy have a good effect on not only for employees but also companies.
First, if companies do so, the workers can gain skills.
heard that the workers who have worked for Canon for 20 years have the excellent skills in creating high quality cameras, and this is obviously a benefit for Canon.
Moreover, the atmosphere will be good because the workers have been
For these reasons, this policy can have a positive effect for the companies.
In conclusion, for these two reasons - relaxed workers and benefit for the company, I believe that companies should hire workers for their entire lives.